Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The death of computerchess.

Author: pjt

Date: 12:30:16 12/20/01

Go up one level in this thread



Agree whole heartedly. For me it has been "What's the purpose of going out and

buying Fritz 7 if Fritz 6 is more than what I already need.




On December 20, 2001 at 06:54:21, Georg Langrath wrote:

>The death of computerchess.
>
>In older days every tablechess was a piece of art. You talked about the design
>and features as much as strength. Later came PC. Now you could talk about design
>and features of interfaces instead beside strength.
>Nowadays it seems as interfaces and new features are dying. Look at Fritz 7. It
>looks like Fritz 6 if I haven’t misunderstood. It has one big development, and
>that is communicating possibilities via Internet.
>And Century 4. I have it. Although I like the interface it is the same as in
>Century 3 in every detail. And it has some small new features.
>That means that the important thing about buying new PC-chess nowadays is that
>it perhaps is a little stronger. Often not more than as best 50 ELO.
>I am not a strong chessplayer, but strength isn’t a problem for most of us
>today. All programs are more than strong enough. Strength can be of importance
>in analyze, but for few of us that important, that you are willing to spend 60$
>for an uncertain increase of perhaps 20 to 50 points.
>And ordinary people are less interested in strength than those in CCC.
>Perhaps there isn’t so much more to develop in features and design of interfaces
>more, but I think that this means that most people will loose their interest in
>buying new chessprograms.
>Anybody that agree?
>
>Georg



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.