Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 14:57:35 12/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2001 at 14:44:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >Because it _assumes_ it will save time here and there by "pondering" correctly >and it adjusts the time target for each move based on this assumption. But >the assumption is _wrong_ since it isn't pondering at all. The time allocation >for ponder=off simply needs more tuning. But I don't _ever_ play serious games >with ponder=off so I never test or tune for that... I can understand that you get bad time allocation, without pondering, that is, too much time is used on a move, or not enough, but to actually lose on time, is another matter. But I see your point. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.