Author: Dan Newman
Date: 15:31:41 12/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2001 at 16:47:29, Ren Wu wrote: >On December 20, 2001 at 15:31:45, Dan Newman wrote: > >>I don't see anything wrong with these numbers. I get 92.4% with nullmoves >>and 98.7% without on this position. But my program has hash tables. It >>also has a fairly complex (and heavily mistuned) eval. When I run it on >>all 300 WAC positions at 1s/posn I get much the same result (92 and 98). >> >>-Dan. > >What kind of move you search first in case you don't have the move from >hashtable? > >Ren. If I'm in the PV, I do an internal iterative deepening search and use that move. If not I generate the captures, sort them with a SEE, and use the top one of those. -Dan. P.S. I tried turning off my hash table and got 90.1% with nullmoves and 99% without. The searches took quite a bit longer...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.