Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess-programming ethics.

Author: blass uri

Date: 07:44:05 06/10/98

Go up one level in this thread



On June 10, 1998 at 06:39:35, Amir Ban wrote:

>I don't know anything about suicide chess, but at some level it becomes
>poor strategy to assume that your opponent will make mistakes.

I think if the computer see that the opponent has an adventage of more
than
2 pawns it is better to assume the opponent will make mistakes
otherwise the computer can do moves that do not give it a practical
chance

there are some assumption that can be done

1)you can assume in this case that the opponent must do in the next move
the move the computer would do if it had only 1 second per move.
2)you can assume the human opponent will miss long moves.

but I think it is not very important for top programs because
in most of the cases these ideas will not help against strong opponents.

> It's ok
>to try to create the sort of game where you are more comfortable than
>your opponent, but in reality strong humans are very good at doing this,
>while computers, despite all intentions of the programmers, usually
>cooperate.
>
>When your opponent is in time pressure and you are not, you want to make
>things complicated, but to play quickly yourself is an elementary error.

I think for computers it is not a mistake to play more quickly than
usual
because computers are better than humans at blitz
I think that if the opponent is in time trouble the computer should
use more time than the opponent but less than the usual time
(I think a geometric mean of the time the computer has for a move
and the time the human has for a move is a good idea of the amount of
time the computer should waste).

another thing that should be done if the opponent is in time trouble
is to increase the value of the computer's pieces in the evaluation
function
so the computer will be against trading pieces and against a draw by
3 time repetition.
I think increasing the value by 10% if the opponent has 1 minutes for
all
the game is good.
the number of % of change in the value of pieces
can be proportional to 1/x when x is the number of
minutes the opponent has for all the game.

Uri





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.