Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:23:24 12/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2001 at 12:11:48, Hans Havermann wrote: >On December 21, 2001 at 11:08:54, Uri Blass wrote: > >>After 51...a3 52.Kc3 Kxd5 53.g6 hxg6 54.fxg6 there is a tablebases mate in 21. > >I got the identical result using William Bryant's Screamer. > >>If Gambittiger can see mate in 21 from the root then it means that >>black blunders at one of the moves 51,52 or 53. > >Notwithstanding our results, isn't it *also* possible that a different initial >(longer) approach results (eventually) in a much shorter tablebase mate? Using common sense suggest that black has no better alternative at moves 51-53 It seems that Screamer and Tiger have the same bug. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.