Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 15:55:17 12/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2001 at 06:45:41, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On December 22, 2001 at 03:50:30, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>It's no joke still I have a little disappointment for you (I think), that is I >>am only going to support Interfaces that correctly have implemented the Winboard >>protocol. Sending the "new game command + the move list" every new move is a >>playing strength killer for each Winboard engine and I don't want my engine to >>play under these Interfaces until it is fixed. > >That won't be a problem for the majority of people interested in WinBoard >compatible engines IMO. The realisation that supporting flawed adaptations by >some commercial interfaces isn't a good idea is dawning. Mainly because no steps >have been made to correct these flaws for a long time and patience isn't >infinite. I think that Frank is of the same opinion. > >Merry Christmas, >Mogens Hi, I have the same opinion, of course ... yes! I will not sitting with a long beard on my PC, I will make, see and try and jump of the roof if options "or better operation xb" work fine after 3 years. I think you know what I mean. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.