Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit Tiger 2.0 vs IM Berg 2500 - Game 4

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 09:06:04 12/23/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 23, 2001 at 10:34:11, Uri Blass wrote:

>On December 23, 2001 at 03:21:58, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>>
>> [D]2bq1rk1/1p2ppbp/r1np2p1/1N6/N1P1n3/1B2B3/PP2QPPP/R4RK1 b - - 0 13
>>
>> This is a position from the fourth game between Gambit Tiger and IM Berg 2500.
>> Here GT presented a theoretical novelty which, as far as I know, never before
>> has been tried. GT played 13.-Be6!?, inviting to an exchange sacrifice.
>
>Here is some analysis of Gambittiger(48 mbytes hash,pIII800)
>
>It got all the history but I admit that I did not play against
>it the moves from the beginning of the game and it is
>also possible that the 48 Mbytes is responsible for
>the different move that my tiger likes.
>
>My tiger wants to play Nf6 and not Be6.



 Yes, when I tried the analyse mode (192 Mb hash), GT also prefered
 13.-Bf5 after the same amount of time that was used in the actual game
 (between 3-4 minutes I think). Just like in your analysis below.
 Then I put up the position after black's 11th move and played 12.c4
 (192 Mb hash - opponent human. Tiger responded with 12.-d6 and
 after 13.Qe2 again played 13.-Be6, just like in the game. Hash was
 cleared between the operations.

 Sune

>
>
>Blass,U - Chess Tiger 14.0
>[D]2bq1rk1/1p2ppbp/r1np2p1/1N6/N1P1n3/1B2B3/PP2QPPP/R4RK1 b - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0:
>
>13...Bf5 14.c5 d5 15.Rad1 Be6 16.Nb6
>  =  (-0.06)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  70kN
>13...Bf5 14.f3 Nf6 15.c5 Ne5 16.cxd6 exd6 17.Bc2
>  =  (0.06)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  116kN
>13...Be6 14.Rad1 Qc8 15.Nb6 Qb8 16.Qf3 Nc5 17.Bxc5 dxc5
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 7   00:00:01  234kN
>13...Be6 14.Rad1 Qc8 15.f3 Nf6 16.Nb6 Qd8 17.Nd5
>  =  (-0.06)   Depth: 8   00:00:02  364kN
>13...Be6 14.f3 Nf6 15.Rad1 Nd7 16.c5 Bxb3 17.axb3 Na5 18.cxd6 Nxb3
>  =  (0.06)   Depth: 9   00:00:04  752kN
>13...Be6 14.f3 Nf6 15.Rad1 Qb8 16.Nb6 Bf5 17.Nd4 Nxd4 18.Bxd4 Qc7
>  =  (0.08)   Depth: 10   00:00:09  1644kN
>13...Be6 14.f3 Nf6 15.Rad1 Qa5 16.Bd2 Qd8 17.Be3
>  =  (0.15)   Depth: 11   00:00:24  4440kN
>13...Nf6 14.c5 d5 15.Nb6 Bf5 16.f3 d4 17.Bf4 Ra5 18.Bc4 d3
>  =  (0.12)   Depth: 11   00:00:43  7754kN
>13...Nf6 14.Rad1 Na5 15.Bc2 Nc6 16.Bb3
>  =  (0.15)   Depth: 12   00:01:36  17378kN
>13...Bf5 14.Rad1 Qa5 15.f3 Nf6 16.Bd2 Qd8 17.Be3 Na5 18.Nd4 Qc8 19.Nxf5 Qxf5
>  =  (0.14)   Depth: 12   00:02:17  25223kN
>13...Bf5 14.Rad1 Qa5 15.f3 Nf6 16.Bd2 Qd8 17.c5 dxc5 18.Bc3 Nd4 19.Nxd4 cxd4
>20.Bxd4 Qc7
>  =  (0.10)   Depth: 13   00:03:12  35481kN
>13...Bf5 14.Rad1 Bd7 15.Rfe1 Qa5 16.Bc2 Nf6 17.Bd2 Qd8 18.Bc3 Ng4 19.Qf3 Bxc3
>20.Naxc3 Qe8
>  =  (0.22)   Depth: 14   00:07:27  84377kN
>13...Nf6 14.Rad1 Bd7 15.f3 Re8 16.a3 Ne5 17.Bd4 Nc6 18.Be3
>  =  (0.15)   Depth: 14   00:11:44  132156kN
>
>(Blass, Tel-aviv 23.12.2001)
>
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.