Author: Jim Monaghan
Date: 13:24:01 12/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 2001 at 05:38:05, Dieter Buerssner wrote:
>On December 24, 2001 at 10:21:17, Jim Monaghan wrote:
>But much earlier, after 7. h5:
>
>[D] 5k2/6p1/5pKp/2R2P1P/1pP5/7r/5P2/8 b - - 0 7
>
>I get:
>
> 467410 4.195 -0.77 10t 7...Rh4 8. f3 Rh3 9. Rc8+ Ke7 10. Rc7+ Kd6 11.
> Rxg7 Rxf3 12. Kxf6 b3 13. Kg6 Kc5 14. Kxh6 Rxf5
> {-80}
> 576709 5.037 -0.76 10t+ 7...b3 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6 11.
> Kxh6 Rh1 12. Rg8 b2 13. Kg6 b1=Q 14. h6 {761}
> 666979 5.748 -0.74 10t 7...b3 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6 11.
> Rg8H Kc7H 12. Kxf6H b2H 13. Rg1H b1=QH 14.
> Rxb1H Kc8H {HT}
> 778543 6.601 -0.74 10. 7...b3 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6 11.
> Rg8 Kc7 12. Kxf6 b2 13. Rg1 b1=Q 14. Rxb1 Kc8
> 1065597 8.652 -0.57 11t 7...b3 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6 11.
> Rg8 Kc7 12. Re8 Rc3 13. Kxh6 b2 14. Re1 Rxc4H
> 15. Rb1H Rc2H {-80}
> 1584483 12.855 -0.56 11t+ 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6
> 11. Rf7 b3 12. Rxf6+ Kc5 13. Kxh6 b2 14. Kh7
> b1=Q 15. h6 {681}
> 1607290 13.042 -0.56 11t 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+H Kd6H 10. Rxg7H
> Kc6H 11. Re7H b3H 12. Re2H Kc5H 13. Kxh6H Kxc4H
> 14. Rb2H Rh3H {-80}
> 1626078 13.210 -0.56 11. 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6
> 11. Re7 b3 12. Re2 Kc5 13. Kxh6 Kxc4 14. Rb2
> Rh3 {-80}
> 2248307 17.740 -0.56 12t 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6
> 11. Re7 b3 12. Re2 Kc5 13. Kxh6 Kxc4 14. Kg6
> Kd3 15. Rb2 {-80}
> 3057215 23.925 -0.56 12. 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6
> 11. Re7 b3 12. Re2 Kc5 13. Kxh6 Kxc4 14. Kg6
> Kd3 15. Rb2 {-80}
> 3967977 30.771 -0.62 13t 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6
> 11. Re7 b3 12. Re2 Kc5 13. Kxh6 Rg1 14. Rb2
> Kxc4 15. f4 Rh1 {-80}
> 5109670 39.765 -0.62 13. 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6
> 11. Re7 b3 12. Re2 Kc5 13. Kxh6 Rg1 14. Rb2
> Kxc4 15. f4 Rh1 {-80}
> 8605144 1:07.3 -0.25 14t 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6
> 11. Re7 b3 12. Re2 Kc5 13. Kxh6 Kxc4 14. Kg6
> Kc3 15. Re3+ Kc2 16. Re7 b2 17. Rc7+ Kd3H {HT}
> {-80}
> 9598948 1:15.3 -0.25 14. 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rc7+ Kd6 10. Rxg7 Kc6
> 11. Re7 b3 12. Re2 Kc5 13. Kxh6 Kxc4 14. Kg6
> Kc3 15. Re3+ Kc2 16. Re7 b2 17. Rc7+ Kd3 {-80}
> 20056638 2:37.8 -0.11 15t 7...Rh1 8. Rd5 Rg1+ 9. Kh7 Rg4H 10. c5H Rc4H
> 11. c6H Rxc6H 12. Rd7H b3H 13. Rxg7H b2H 14.
> Rg8+H {HT} {0}
> 21273683 2:47.5 -0.11 15. 7...Rh1 8. Rd5 Rg1+ 9. Kh7 Rg4 10. c5 Rc4 11.
> c6 Rxc6 12. Rd7 b3 13. Rxg7 b2 14. Rg8+ {HT} {0}
> 35224173 4:39.6 -0.09 16t 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rb8 Rg1+H 10. Kh7H Rg5H
> 11. Rb7+H Kd6H 12. Rb5H b3H 13. Rb6+H Kc5H 14.
> 38451376 5:04.9 -0.09 16. 7...Rh1 8. Rc8+ Ke7 9. Rb8 Rg1+ 10. Kh7 Rg5 11.
> Rb7+ Kd6 12. Rb5 b3 13. Rb6+ Kc5 14. Rxf6
>
>And again, (you guessed it :-) after some moves I get draw score.
>
>Cheers,
>Dieter
Hi Dieter,
Crafty 18.12
(+0.29) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh2 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg2+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Kxg7 Rxf5 8. Kxh6 Rxf3
(+0.29) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh2 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg2+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Kxg7 Rxf5 8. Kxh6 Rxf3
(+0.29) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh2 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg2+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Kxg7 Rxf5 8. Kxh6 Rxf3
(+0.42) 1. ... Rh4 2. Rc8+ Ke7 3. Rb8 Rxc4 4. Kxg7 Rd4 5. Kxh6 Rh4 6. Rb7+ Kd6
7. Kg6 Ke5
(+0.42) 1. ... Rh4 2. Rc8+ Ke7 3. Rb8 Rxc4 4. Kxg7 Rd4 5. Kxh6 Rh4 6. Rb7+ Kd6
7. Kg6 Ke5
(+0.29) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh3 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg3+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Kxg7 Rxf5 8. Kxh6 <HT>
(+0.29) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh3 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg3+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Kxg7 Rxf5 8. Kxh6 <HT>
(+0.60) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh3 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg3+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Kxg7 Rxf5 8. Kxh6 Rxf3 9. c5
(+0.60) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh3 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg3+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Kxg7 Rxf5 8. Kxh6 Rxf3 9. c5
(+0.51) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh3 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg3+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Rb7+ Kd6 8. Rxg7 Rxf5 9. Kxh6 Rxf3 10. Rf7
(+0.51) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh3 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg3+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Rb7+ Kd6 8. Rxg7 Rxf5 9. Kxh6 Rxf3 10. Rf7
(+0.60) 1. ... Rh4 2. f3 Rh3 3. Rc8+ Ke7 4. Rb8 Rg3+ 5. Kh7 Rg5 6. Rxb4 Rxh5 7.
Rb7+ Kd6 8. Kxg7 Rxf5 9. Rb6+ Ke7 10. Kxh6 Rxf3 11. c5
(+0.48) 1. ... Rh2 2. Rc8+ Ke7 3. Rb8 Rg2+ 4. Kh7 Rg5 5. Rb7+ Kd6 6. Rb5 b3 7.
f3 b2 8. Rxb2 Ke5 9. Rb5+ Kd4 10. f4 Rxh5 11. Kxg7 Kxc4
(+0.48) 1. ... Rh2 2. Rc8+ Ke7 3. Rb8 Rg2+ 4. Kh7 Rg5 5. Rb7+ Kd6 6. Rb5 b3 7.
f3 b2 8. Rxb2 Ke5 9. Rb5+ Kd4 10. f4 Rxh5 11. Kxg7 Kxc4
(+0.50) 1. ... Rh2 2. Rc8+ Ke7 3. Rb8 Rg2+ 4. Kh7 Rg5 5. Rb7+ Kd6 6. Rxb4 Rxh5
7. f4 Rxf5 8. Kg6 Ra5 9. Kxg7 f5 10. Kxh6 Kc5 11. Rb5+ Rxb5 12. cxb5 Kxb5
(+0.50) 1. ... Rh2 2. Rc8+ Ke7 3. Rb8 Rg2+ 4. Kh7 Rg5 5. Rb7+ Kd6 6. Rxb4 Rxh5
7. f4 Rxf5 8. Kg6 Ra5 9. Kxg7 f5 10. Kxh6 Kc5 11. Rb5+ Rxb5 12. cxb5 Kxb5
Yes, I guess it looks like a draw. I played around with the position for awhile
but couldn't find any improvements. In one line I had White with 4 isolated
pawns vs the black rook ending in a draw. Perhaps another example of computers
disproving game annotations. I wonder what Capa would have done? It looks like
Kostics self-destructed defending against an imaginary threat (penetration of
the WK to g6).
Cheers,
Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.