Author: Robert Pope
Date: 05:53:10 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2001 at 12:06:49, guy haworth wrote: > >Heiner is about right. > >A 'broken position' is one which has been _seen_ to be illegal. The only two >reasons (in fact) why this should be are: > >1) the side-to-move is in check > >2) two pieces share the same square (e.g. Q and R in KQRK, wtm) > >G You mean "the side not-to-move is in check", right? If side-to-move is in check, they just use their move to get out of check.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.