Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Quality of SSDF pgn database

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 06:41:36 12/27/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 27, 2001 at 05:54:17, Tony Hedlund wrote:

>>I think that's an exaggeration. Nobody have complaint before. Your examples is
>old results, probably before I made it public. Our newer results is more
>unified.
>
>Best wishes
>   Tony

Hi Tony

No exaggeration: the database [especially the old games] is even worse than
imagined at first sight. I will need weeks to alter it in a for my purpose
suitable way. There are hundred of games stating for example white = 'Rebel8
(1)' and 'Rebel9 (22)' and so on. Here one must edit each single game, because
Rebel 8 and Rebel 9 exist but no Rebel8 (22) and so on. If you are interested, I
will send you the reorganised database in portions as soon as I have finished my
work: every day half an hour work, so that you will have to wait until next
summer! But it's of course not an urgent matter.

By the way, the databases now published are always o.k.

Regards
Kurt




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.