Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 08:31:11 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 09:41:36, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 05:54:17, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >>>I think that's an exaggeration. Nobody have complaint before. Your examples is >>old results, probably before I made it public. Our newer results is more >>unified. >> >>Best wishes >> Tony > >Hi Tony > >No exaggeration: the database [especially the old games] is even worse than >imagined at first sight. I will need weeks to alter it in a for my purpose >suitable way. There are hundred of games stating for example white = 'Rebel8 >(1)' and 'Rebel9 (22)' and so on. Here one must edit each single game, because >Rebel 8 and Rebel 9 exist but no Rebel8 (22) and so on. With exaggeration I meant "People all over the world would appreciate that". I know that the old games is a mess. >If you are interested, I >will send you the reorganised database in portions as soon as I have finished my >work: every day half an hour work, so that you will have to wait until next >summer! But it's of course not an urgent matter. I'm interested! > >By the way, the databases now published are always o.k. > When I've uploaded them, yes. But last week I got 40 games between Chess Tiger 14 - Opponent (??). Tony >Regards >Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.