Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:42:16 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 04:33:54, Tony Werten wrote:
>On December 27, 2001 at 00:33:57, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On December 26, 2001 at 20:38:18, Andrew Smith wrote:
>>
>>>On December 26, 2001 at 19:59:00, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 26, 2001 at 18:01:35, Andrew Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>An interesting position, where the point is not to find some particular move,
>>>>>but to avoid one. Qxh6? is not right in this position. How long does your
>>>>>favourite program need to avoid it?
>>>>>
>>>>>6k1/p3b1np/6pr/6P1/1B2p2Q/K7/7P/8 w KQkq - 0 1
>>>>>
>>>>>Interesting to see gambit tiger 2.0 analysis after a while. The score is clearly
>>>>>dropping
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>[D]6k1/p3b1np/6pr/6P1/1B2p2Q/K7/7P/8 w - - 0 1
>>>>>
>>>>>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0:
>>>>>
>>>>>1.Qxh6 Nf5 2.Qh3 Bxg5 3.Qg4 Bc1+ 4.Kb3
>>>>> +- (4.08) Depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN
>>>>>1.Qxh6 Nf5 2.Qh3 Bxg5 3.Qg4 Bc1+ 4.Ka2 a5 5.Bxa5
>>>>> +- (4.30) Depth: 7 00:00:00 11kN
>>>>>1.Qxh6 Nf5 2.Qh3 Bxg5 3.Qg4 Bc1+ 4.Kb3 a5 5.Bxa5
>>>>> +- (4.90) Depth: 8 00:00:01 28kN
>>>>>1.Qxh6 Nf5 2.Qh3 Bxg5
>>>>> +- (4.90) Depth: 9 00:00:01 60kN
>>>>>1.Qxh6 Nf5 2.Qh3 Bxg5 3.Qb3+ Kg7 4.Qd5 Bf4 5.Qxe4 Bxh2 6.Qb7+ Kh6 7.Qxa7
>>>>> +- (4.80) Depth: 10 00:00:02 106kN
>>>>>1.Qxh6 Nf5 2.Qh3 Bxg5 3.Qg4 a5 4.Bc5 Bc1+ 5.Kb3 Kf7 6.Qxe4 Kf6
>>>>> +- (5.00) Depth: 11 00:00:07 482kN
>>>>>1.Qxh6
>>>>> +- (4.10) Depth: 12 00:01:02 4288kN
>>>>>1.Qxh6
>>>>> +- (3.20) Depth: 13 00:04:21 17331kN
>>>>>
>>>>>(only, MyTown 01.11.2001)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Chess Tiger 14.8 needs 23.83s to see the score drop to -3.50 and 91.78s to
>>>>switch to Qxe4 (K6-2 450MHz, 96Mb hash).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christophe
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi, Christophe!
>>>
>>>It looks to me like you are making some big improvements in this new tiger!
>>
>>
>>
>>I hope so!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I
>>>can show you my completed analysis on a 333mhz computer (not that much slower
>>>than yours.) Two and a half hours to switch to Qxe4!
>>
>>
>>
>>Yes, and it even looks like the new Tiger will be one of the fastest on this
>>position...
>>
>>The best time I have seen so far by another program is just below 30 seconds,
>>but on a very fast Athlon!!!
>
>Sorry. XiniX needs 30 sec to solve the faillow of Qxh6 ( on an AMD 333, 32Mb)
>
>ply:13/23 score:-1,281 time: 30s 76Kn/s
>1.Qxh6 Bxb4+ 2.Kxb4 Nh5 3.h3 e3 4.Kc3 e2 5.Kd2 a5 6.Qxh5 gxh5 7.Kxe2
>
>then it immediately fails high on Qxe4, but after solving it, it's not very
>impressive.
>
>ply:13/27 score:0,336 time: 51s 78Kn/s
>1.Qxe4 Bxb4+ 2.Kxb4
>
>Tony
OK, you win on this one! :)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.