Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:15:34 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 13:32:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >I hope that no programer will believe you.Sorry, but your understanding of chess >is a joke.Please buy some books of chesstrategy. > >TL My understanding of chess is not a joke. My rating is close to 2000. I also did not say that black had not better position but I believe that people underestimate the importance of tactics in chess. From human point of view you can talk about positional errors but from computer's point of view there are tactical errors that humans do not understand and it is important to find them. Deeper blue got worse positions against kasparov but kasparov could not win the game. I believe that chess is mainly tactics and it is important to find the tactcial mistake. I also said that my impression is that 45.f3 is better than 45.Be1 because white tries to do something in order to get mobility for the pieces. I think that deciding that black is winning many moves before move 45 is not a responsble statement and the only clear thing is that black's position is better. I agree that I prefer 7.Qd2 or 7.Qb3 instead of 7.Qd1 and I only disagree that it is clearly the losing error for the following reasons: 1)It seems that white wasted a lot of tempos and played with no plan later. 2)I need to see a proof that someone is losing and the fact that I do not like white's position is not enough so even after white wasted a lot of tempos I am careful not to say that white is losing unless I can prove it by computers. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.