Author: Martin Müller
Date: 12:34:51 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 15:15:34, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 14:40:21, Martin Müller wrote: > >>Dear Thomas, >> >>As your posting's only purpose is to say that someone's chess knowledges are not >>good enough, I consider it as inappropriate. It does not contribute anything to >>find out where S6 went wrong. Even if the statements made by Uri would be >>incorrect, it would be much more useful to argue with concrete facts instead of >>telling here to a person in a pretty ungentle manner that he is not qualified. >> >>Kind regards >>Martin > >Dear Martin, > >you mean we should discuss with uri this position ? > >[D]4q1rk/p2b2r1/1p1p1n2/2pP1ppp/2P1p3/P1P1P2P/1RQBBPP1/5RK1 w - - > >I think it would be more interesting to look at move 18. by shredder and suggest >the better move 18.a2-a4 > >Greetings Thomas Hi Thomas, At the position given by you a2-a4 is not possible as the pawn is placed on a3 already. Further it is not move 18 but move 45 to be completed by white. S6 responded by Rbb1. Could you recheck this? Kind regards Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.