Author: Martin Müller
Date: 12:40:40 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 15:15:34, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 14:40:21, Martin Müller wrote: > >>Dear Thomas, >> >>As your posting's only purpose is to say that someone's chess knowledges are not >>good enough, I consider it as inappropriate. It does not contribute anything to >>find out where S6 went wrong. Even if the statements made by Uri would be >>incorrect, it would be much more useful to argue with concrete facts instead of >>telling here to a person in a pretty ungentle manner that he is not qualified. >> >>Kind regards >>Martin > >Dear Martin, > >you mean we should discuss with uri this position ? > >[D]4q1rk/p2b2r1/1p1p1n2/2pP1ppp/2P1p3/P1P1P2P/1RQBBPP1/5RK1 w - - > >I think it would be more interesting to look at move 18. by shredder and suggest >the better move 18.a2-a4 > >Greetings Thomas Hi Thomas, Sorry. Now I understand. Of course at move 18 white could have realised a4! Interesting idea and much more activ! Regards Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.