Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 13:08:34 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 15:40:40, Martin Müller wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 15:15:34, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>On December 27, 2001 at 14:40:21, Martin Müller wrote: >> >>>Dear Thomas, >>> >>>As your posting's only purpose is to say that someone's chess knowledges are not >>>good enough, I consider it as inappropriate. It does not contribute anything to >>>find out where S6 went wrong. Even if the statements made by Uri would be >>>incorrect, it would be much more useful to argue with concrete facts instead of >>>telling here to a person in a pretty ungentle manner that he is not qualified. >>> >>>Kind regards >>>Martin >> >>Dear Martin, >> >>you mean we should discuss with uri this position ? >> >>[D]4q1rk/p2b2r1/1p1p1n2/2pP1ppp/2P1p3/P1P1P2P/1RQBBPP1/5RK1 w - - >> >>I think it would be more interesting to look at move 18. by shredder and suggest >>the better move 18.a2-a4 >> >>Greetings Thomas > >Hi Thomas, > >Sorry. Now I understand. Of course at move 18 white could have realised a4! > >Interesting idea and much more activ! > >Regards >Martin It was my pleasure. [D]2r2rk1/p3qppp/1p1p1nb1/2p1p3/2PP4/PQP1P3/1B2BPPP/2R1R1K1 w - - 18.a3-a4 !? with the idear of a4-a5
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.