Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:13:25 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 16:14:22, Will Bundy wrote: > > Does anyone have any opinions on Which programs play the Most like a Human >Grandmaster in terms of strategy and Tactics? I am aware that Computers do not >have the Understanding of Chess that Grandmasters have, but what programs are >able to simulate Grandmaster Play the Most? None of them. The play is very different. A computer program searches with almost flawless precision to find tiny fractions of a pawn advantage and any tactical shot like grabbing a pawn. Human GM's don't play like that for the most part. Polgar and Morphy are tactical sorts, but most GM's have a very different style from computers. CS-Tal plays wild "pirates pouring over the walls" attacks. Gambit Tiger apparently is made to understand gambits to some degree. But really, you can't compare the play very well. Both machines and top human experts play exceptional chess games. But the way that they go from "point a" to "point b" is not the same at all. IMO-YMMV.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.