Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Rating list

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 15:36:39 12/27/01

Go up one level in this thread

On December 27, 2001 at 18:17:52, Mark Young wrote:

>Nice to see that SSDF now shows what some of us have been showing in our own
>testing for some time now. ChessTiger 14 is the strongest of the Tiger programs
>ahead of GambitTiger 2.0, and also shows ChessTiger 14 to be the strongest
>program ahead of Deep Fritz.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

The SSDF data certainly does not support it.  The error bars are far in excess
of any difference in strength estimation.

Not to say that the conclusions are not correct.  Only that the SSDF data does
not show this.  If anything, it shows that the top 3 programs are of the same
strength.

• Re: SSDF Rating list Mark Young 16:06:38 12/27/01
  • Re: SSDF Rating list Dann Corbit 16:35:30 12/27/01
    • Re: SSDF Rating list Mark Young 16:56:59 12/27/01
      • Re: SSDF Rating list Dann Corbit 17:16:39 12/27/01
        • Re: SSDF Rating list Mark Young 17:22:15 12/27/01
          • Re: SSDF Rating list Dann Corbit 17:24:53 12/27/01
            • Re: SSDF Rating list Mark Young 17:29:35 12/27/01
  • Re: SSDF Rating list Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:12:02 12/27/01
    • Re: SSDF Rating list enrico carrisco 19:02:12 12/27/01
    • Re: SSDF Rating list Mark Young 16:26:07 12/27/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.