Author: Mark Young
Date: 16:06:38 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 18:36:39, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 18:17:52, Mark Young wrote: > >>Nice to see that SSDF now shows what some of us have been showing in our own >>testing for some time now. ChessTiger 14 is the strongest of the Tiger programs >>ahead of GambitTiger 2.0, and also shows ChessTiger 14 to be the strongest >>program ahead of Deep Fritz. > >How did you arrive at those conclusions? What do you mean.... Just noting that SSDF now shows ChessTiger 14 to be the strongest program. That agrees with my testing, and what others have been saying. I thought it was clear from the post how I arrived at my conclusions. I also thought I have been clear for my postings that I thought ChessTiger 14 to be the strongest program. Regardless of what SSDF was showing. If you remember we thought ChessTiger 14 would top the the last list, but it did not happen till now. > >The SSDF data certainly does not support it. The error bars are far in excess >of any difference in strength estimation. > >Not to say that the conclusions are not correct. Only that the SSDF data does >not show this. If anything, it shows that the top 3 programs are of the same >strength.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.