Author: Mark Young
Date: 16:22:03 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 19:08:52, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 18:59:00, Mark Young wrote: > >>On December 27, 2001 at 18:44:39, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 27, 2001 at 18:17:52, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>Nice to see that SSDF now shows what some of us have been showing in our own >>>>testing for some time now. ChessTiger 14 is the strongest of the Tiger programs >>>>ahead of GambitTiger 2.0, and also shows ChessTiger 14 to be the strongest >>>>program ahead of Deep Fritz. >>>> >>>>Way to go Christophe. >>> >>>I remember that you claimed also that Gambittiger is probably stronger than >>>Tiger14 when the hardware is fast enough. >>> >>>The latest results do not support it because Gambittiger has better rating on >>>slow hardware when Tiger14 has better rating on fast hardware. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>Why remember, when you can search for the post and you can get it right. > >I searched for the post and here is a link for it >You claimed there that you start to suspect that Gambittiger starts to be >stronger at 1-3 minutes per move on 1 Ghz. > >http://www.it.ro/ccc_search/ccc.php?art_id=190449 > >Uri That is better Uri, I said nothing about fast hardware, and I drew no firm conclusions that GT was better then CT. As you know it takes a fine eye and lots of testing to determain who is better then who when the top programs are so close to each other. It took a long time for SSDF to agree with what some of us have been showing in our own testing, as you may remember many of us thought ChessTiger would top the last SSDF list. The next list it could change again.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.