Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 19:05:28 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 21:55:51, Gogi Cviak wrote: >We did warn Raymond Keene and the Braingames, DEEP FRITZ IS NOT THE BEST, CLOSE >BUT NOT THE BEST, and I am sure no program comes close today to Deep Blue from >97, because none of today's 8 processors cant come even at all close to the SP >processor from 4 years ago > >KRAMNIK WILL NOT BE PLAYING THE BEST COMPUTER! As far as I know, there is no multiple CPU version of Chess Tiger. The SSDF only tests under a very specific scenario (autoplayer, single CPU systems currently). When comparing apples to oranges, I always choose the banana. >On December 27, 2001 at 15:31:38, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On December 27, 2001 at 14:49:44, Thoralf Karlsson wrote: >> >>> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2001-12-27 83119 games played by 229 computers >>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>> 1 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2715 38 -36 378 66% 2600 >>> 2 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2711 37 -35 390 63% 2618 >>> 3 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2696 40 -39 319 61% 2617 >> >>Yum! Tiger has a Deep Fritz sandwitch for lunch! >>;-) >> >>Of course, within the error bars, they are all the same. >>Just the same, maybe we can change the name from "Deep Fritz" to "Pomme Frites" >>:)) >>Might be a hit at Walter's Futterkripe. >>[snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.