Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:44:04 12/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 20:39:31, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 15:47:33, Uri Blass wrote: > >>There are practical cases when the qsearch include >>hundreds of nodes > >Hundreds of nodes are insignificant. > >Every node you search that doesn't end up in the PV is arguably wasted. > >It has been pointed out to you that if you do static evaluation of a dynamic >position, the results are absolutely worthless. I do not believe you've >responded to this argument. Do you disagree with it? > >-Tom The results are not absolutely worthless I can also use a special evaluation to reduce the demage and I agree that using evaluate that only count pieces in the board is not the right evaluation. I expect the side to move to earn something(I can assume that the side to move earn half of the material that it can capture and I think that I have better ideas that do not cost me a lot of time). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.