Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 08:29:23 12/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 22:53:20, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 22:40:19, pavel wrote: >[snip] >>hahaha dann, >>he is even better than michael. > >About the same. Reminds me a bit of mick something-or-other who used to post >here. But he's a rank amateur compared to Archimedes Plutonium: >http://groups.google.com/groups?as_ugroup=sci.math&as_uauthors=archimedes%20plutonium&hl=en > >Or James Harris: >http://groups.google.com/groups?as_ugroup=sci.math&as_uauthors=james%20harris&hl=en > While Archimedes Plutonium is a bit "strange" I wouldn't call James Harris a troll. He sincerely believes he has a simple proof of FLT (or that's the last thing I heard, haven't followed that newsgroup for a while). His problem is that he can't explain his calculations in a way that allows others to point out his mistake in a way he can understand :) Ralf >And none of them can hold a candle to the greatest troll of all time, Scott >Nudds: >http://groups.google.com/groups?as_ugroup=comp.lang.c&as_uauthors=scott%20nudds&hl=en
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.