Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF rating list

Author: Paul Petersson

Date: 10:47:35 06/12/98

Go up one level in this thread


On June 12, 1998 at 10:55:32, Graham Laight wrote:

>Looks like it's the end of the line for the SSDF list.

No, it´s not. The next list, 3/98 (980609), is already finished. It
hasn´t been published yet for various reasons, but you can expect it
sometime next week.

Paul

>
>It was due to update in early April. It's now mid June, and it still
>hasn't updated.
>
>Anyway, the autotester methgodology entails the computers playing
>thousands of games that no human will ever see.
>
>Human chess players don't play thousands of games between 2 players,
>just to make sure the result is exactly right.
>
>In sport, the winner is the person who wins on the day. Who produces a
>little extra magic when it is needed.
>
>The autotester methodology is taking the game too far away from human
>experience for it to be worth doing in the context of providing sport or
>entertainment for mankind.
>
>I challenge anyone to tell me why autotesting is a good thing to do!
>
>Having said that, I eagerly await the next SSDF list. :-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.