Author: Peter Berger
Date: 14:44:02 12/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2001 at 12:17:30, Dieter Buerssner wrote:
>
>Again, I have no idea how Tiger an Rebel reach this depth so fast. Yace on my
>K6-2 475 with 30M hash:
>
> 171706680 16:51.7 0.33 13. 1. Ke3 dxc5 2. bxc5 g4 3. Kd4 h5 4. Ke3 Kf6 5.
> Kd3 Ke7 6. Ke2 Kd7 7. Kd2 Ke7 8. Kd3 Kd7 9. Kc4
> h4 10. gxh4 g3 11. c6+ Ke7 {HT} {80}
> 424150223 41:09.2 0.00 14t 1. Ke3 c6 2. dxc6 dxc5 3. b5 Kd6 4. Kf3 Kc7 5.
> Ke3 Kd6 {0}
> 441335848 42:59.6 0.01 14t+ 1. fxg5 hxg5 2. c6 Kd8 3. Ke3 Kc8 4. Kd3 Kb8 5.
> Kc4 Kc8 6. b5 g4 7. b6 cxb6 8. Kd3 Kc7 {-80}
> 455265135 44:28.2 0.09 14t 1. fxg5 hxg5 2. c6 Kd8 3. Ke3 Kc8 4. Kd3 Kb8 5.
> Kc4 Ka7 6. b5 f4 7. gxf4 gxf4 8. Kd3 Kb6 9. Ke4
> f3 10. Ke3 {0}
> 541680597 52:55.7 0.09 14. 1. fxg5 hxg5 2. c6 Kd8 3. Ke3 Kc8 4. Kd3 Kb8 5.
> Kc4 Ka7 6. b5 f4 7. gxf4 gxf4 8. Kd3 Kb6 9. Ke4
> f3 10. Ke3 {0}
> 614406340 1:00:35 0.00 15t 1. fxg5 hxg5 2. Ke3 dxc5 3. bxc5 Kf6 4. Kd3 Ke5
> 5. Kc4 f4 6. gxf4+ gxf4 7. d6 cxd6 {EGTB} 8. c6
> f3 9. c7 f2! {Not all positions found in TB}
> {-80}
>1184883984 1:59:35 0.01 15t+ 1. g4 fxg4 2. f5 h5 3. cxd6+ cxd6 4. Ke3 g3 5.
> b5 g2 6. Kf2 g1=Q+ 7. Kxg1 g4 8. Kg2 h4 9. f6+
> Kxf6 10. b6 h3+ 11. Kg3 Ke7 12. b7 Kf6 13. b8=Q
> Ke5H {HT} {841}
>1377396792 2:19:04 0.49 15++ 1. g4 fxg4 2. f5 h5 3. cxd6+ cxd6 4. Ke3 g3 5.
> b5 g2 6. Kf2 h4 7. f6+ Kxf6 8. b6 h3 9. b7 h2
> 10. Kxg2 g4 11. b8=Q h1=R
>1570536197 2:38:49 1.49 15++ 1. g4 fxg4 2. f5 h5 3. cxd6+ cxd6 4. Ke3 g3 5.
> b5 g2 6. Kf2 h4 7. f6+ Kxf6 8. b6 h3 9. b7 h2
> 10. Kxg2 g4 11. b8=Q h1=R
>
>After which I stopped it.
>
>Regards,
>Dieter
I tried with Gerrit Reubold's Bringer on Athlon1333. It was quite fast with the
fail high on 1. g4 - 7 minutes. But it definitely took some time to resolve it.
I stopped the analysis after 5 hours.
0:02:46.7 (17/48) 84432574 -0.02 1.Ke3 g4 2.Kd4 Kd7 3.c6+ Kc8 4.b5 Kb8 5.b6
cxb6 6.Kc4 (Mat=-100,50=1) (TB=21095)
0:07:06.1 (17/51) 206499894 -0.01 1.g4 (Mat=0,50=0) (TB=32910)
1:47:10.1 (17/53) 4219447369 0.49 1.g4 (Mat=0,50=0) (TB=38326)
2:20:23.0 (18/55) 5283958678 0.89 1.g4 (Mat=0,50=0) (TB=71567)
4:11:08.6 (18/55) 9933386240 1.29 1.g4 (Mat=0,50=0) (TB=79150)
Genius 5 is quite good in this position. On a PIII1200 it took 4 minutes to fail
high on 1. g4 at ply 15 and after 10 minutes it was up to more than +3 .
pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.