Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 17:06:40 12/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2001 at 11:03:44, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >>I think you are wrong here ,Alekhine did not missed the move R x Bd4 ,he played >>it against Opocensky in Paris 1925. > >I suspect not he but Schiller is wrong, as he took it from the Schiller book. >Schiller wrong? [cheap shot warning:] How is it *possible*? > >J. > > >Here's the game: > >[Event "Paris"] >[Site "Paris"] >[Date "1925.??.??"] >[Round "5"] >[White "Alekhine, Alexander"] >[Black "Opocensky, Karel"] >[Result "1-0"] >[ECO "D10"] >[PlyCount "55"] >[EventDate "1925.??.??"] >[Source "ChessBase"] > >1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e3 Bf5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. Bc4 e6 7. Nge2 Nd7 8. e4 >Nxc3 9. Nxc3 Bg6 10. O-O Qh4 11. d5 exd5 12. g3 Qf6 13. exd5 Bc5 14. Re1+ Kf8 >15. Bf4 Nb6 16. Bb3 h5 17. h4 Kg8 18. Rc1 Bd4 19. dxc6 bxc6 20. Ne4 Bxe4 21. >Rxe4 c5 22. Qe2 g6 23. Bg5 Qd6 24. Qf3 Qf8 25. Rxd4 cxd4 26. Rc6 Kh7 27. Bxf7 >Rc8 28. Rxg6 1-0 Reading all this I think Capablanca was wise writing a book wich included most of his lost games. hehe But it hapened more that a game wich became a draw later on (or even earlier By diferent players) ended in a win espacialy if a sacrefice was needed to make this happen. Vucovich did call this the will to win. I even could show you computer computer games where this could happen. If computers could see or learn this they would become stronger. Regards Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.