Author: John Merlino
Date: 22:34:07 12/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2001 at 20:52:22, Graham Banks wrote: >Hi Mike, >I know about Chessfun's page. Some of the custom settings there were ones I >devised (Octopus, Titan, Fortress, Omega - maybe a few others - not sure from >memory). >I've tried The Fun and Utzinger settings also. The main difficulty in finding >the best settings is in the fact that some perform well at certain time controls >but not others. Looking for the most consistent settings across the whole range >of time controls is the key and I'm still working on it. Once I've done that I >need to see how results against programs like Shredder,Fritz and company compare >with previous efforts. >Graham. You've made the main argument for the default "Chessmaster" personality settings; they are believed to be the "best" for all time controls and all processor possibilities. Most personalities that have been touted by their creators tend to be better than the default at longer time controls and/or faster processors only. Johan has done much testing in this regard, and that is why the Chessmaster personality is the way it is. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.