Author: Gogi Cviak
Date: 23:41:01 12/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
in rocket science terms can u explain your value? how about 0? On December 28, 2001 at 11:29:23, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >On December 27, 2001 at 22:53:20, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On December 27, 2001 at 22:40:19, pavel wrote: >>[snip] >>>hahaha dann, >>>he is even better than michael. >> >>About the same. Reminds me a bit of mick something-or-other who used to post >>here. But he's a rank amateur compared to Archimedes Plutonium: >>http://groups.google.com/groups?as_ugroup=sci.math&as_uauthors=archimedes%20plutonium&hl=en >> >>Or James Harris: >>http://groups.google.com/groups?as_ugroup=sci.math&as_uauthors=james%20harris&hl=en >> > >While Archimedes Plutonium is a bit "strange" I wouldn't call >James Harris a troll. He sincerely believes he has a simple proof >of FLT (or that's the last thing I heard, haven't followed >that newsgroup for a while). His problem is that he can't >explain his calculations in a way that allows others to point >out his mistake in a way he can understand :) > >Ralf > > >>And none of them can hold a candle to the greatest troll of all time, Scott >>Nudds: >>http://groups.google.com/groups?as_ugroup=comp.lang.c&as_uauthors=scott%20nudds&hl=en
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.