Author: Gogi Cviak
Date: 00:03:30 12/29/01
>KNNN vs KR can't possibly be a win for the knights, since RxN is drawn, and >there are three of them to threaten. In KBN vs KRR, "all" you have to do to win >is win an exchange with a knight while preserving your bishop, but in this one >you have to win a whole rook while preserving everything. -Interesting Questions -Bruce so KBN VS KRR, can they win? When will all this 6 pieces be finished and I dont mean those with the pawns, but I would suggest to Eugene to make the most important endings, like: RPPKRK, IS THIS REALLY A DRAW? Will be ever see perfect moves for this? SO KNNN is a draw, but KNNB VS rook is also a draw? KRNN VS KR I ALSO THINK IS A DRAW what about KRBN VS KR, i think we have a win there in over 200 moves? same with KRBB? Hey if this happens I guess it should be played in real matches, sorry, a win is a win, sure there can be a break, but play must continue... NOW, KNN V K, IS A DRAW, but dont u think that is A HUGE INJUSTICE IN CHESS, I MEAN THAT'S 6.25 POINTS, DONT U THINK IN THAT CASE THERE SHOULD BE A NEW RULE, LIKE ADDING A PAWN OR A BISHOP? So, tell me KNNN VS KB, IS THIS A WIN? how many moves? Ken Thompson's endings, I know they are different format from Nalimov's but I am wondering, they both used different methods in finding the perfect moves?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.