Author: Gogi Cviak
Date: 00:43:39 12/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2001 at 22:05:28, Dann Corbit wrote: http://www.geocities.com/chesschampby2k/LongLongCastle.txt good? >On December 27, 2001 at 21:55:51, Gogi Cviak wrote: > >>We did warn Raymond Keene and the Braingames, DEEP FRITZ IS NOT THE BEST, CLOSE >>BUT NOT THE BEST, and I am sure no program comes close today to Deep Blue from >>97, because none of today's 8 processors cant come even at all close to the SP >>processor from 4 years ago >> >>KRAMNIK WILL NOT BE PLAYING THE BEST COMPUTER! > >As far as I know, there is no multiple CPU version of Chess Tiger. The SSDF >only tests under a very specific scenario (autoplayer, single CPU systems >currently). > >When comparing apples to oranges, I always choose the banana. > >>On December 27, 2001 at 15:31:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On December 27, 2001 at 14:49:44, Thoralf Karlsson wrote: >>> >>>> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2001-12-27 83119 games played by 229 computers >>>> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >>>> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >>>> 1 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2715 38 -36 378 66% 2600 >>>> 2 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2711 37 -35 390 63% 2618 >>>> 3 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2696 40 -39 319 61% 2617 >>> >>>Yum! Tiger has a Deep Fritz sandwitch for lunch! >>>;-) >>> >>>Of course, within the error bars, they are all the same. >>>Just the same, maybe we can change the name from "Deep Fritz" to "Pomme Frites" >>>:)) >>>Might be a hit at Walter's Futterkripe. >>>[snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.