Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What's Fritz's IQ?

Author: Otello Gnaramori

Date: 01:24:55 12/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 28, 2001 at 23:51:33, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On December 28, 2001 at 21:57:03, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>
>>I think it is rather well established by now that human players are, like
>>computers, studying a chess tree, trying to find the best possible continuation.
>
>Actually, not. That is the vicious influence from Kotov's teaching that
>made everybody think that they should think like a tree.
>There are recently two books that finally made in writing what everybody
>suspected. "Improve your Chess Now" by J. Tisdall and "Secrets of Practical
>Chess". Not even amateurs are taught NOT to think like a tree nowadays, and the
>best book about it is "How to reasess your Chess" by J. Silman.
>
>First quote from Tisdall's book, first Chapter ("The Fabled Tree of Analysis"):
>
>"I do not think like a tree - do you think like a tree?" GM Anatoly Lein.
>
>There are certain situations where a strong player think like a tree, but
>their thinking should certainly not be characterized by that.
>

Taking as an example Kasparov, he is renowned for his powerful calculations
capabilities of the variations (...tree), both in analysis and both in OTB.


>
>>Their way of searching this tree is probably very different of the way current
>>alpha-beta algorithms do it, but still they are studying a tree.
>>
>>The NPS idea is based just on this fact: in a tree you have nodes, and after a
>>while you have visited a number of nodes, so you can compute a "NPS".
>
>It is possible that in an endgame, you can be staring at the position for 10
>minutes and make a very strong move without calculating like a tree a single
>move, based only on general considerations and _retrograde_ analysis or a goal
>seeking approach. Once you find the plan, everything falls into place.
>

Actually without calculating, your plan can fail miserably after few moves, but
in that case we say that the player used an "heuristic" approach dictated by
his/her intuition or from a "pattern recognition" process that helps to prune
the tree and speedup the move choice, but as I said , it's prone to error
without the methodical verification of the calculus.


w.b.r.
Otello



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.