Author: Uri Blass
Date: 18:14:08 12/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2001 at 20:54:14, James T. Walker wrote: >Thanks for the info. I think this also proves that Deep Blue's evaluation was >not as simple/crude as some people here try to portray it. >Jim It does not mean that the evaluation was good. It seems that Deep thought wasted time in calculating tables that may be good to evaluate the root position but not good to evaluate the leaves of the tree. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.