Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What's Fritz's IQ?

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 19:11:54 12/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 29, 2001 at 19:04:38, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On December 29, 2001 at 16:44:51, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>
>>On December 29, 2001 at 11:55:21, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On December 29, 2001 at 04:40:03, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 29, 2001 at 04:24:55, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On December 28, 2001 at 23:51:33, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On December 28, 2001 at 21:57:03, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I think it is rather well established by now that human players are, like
>>>>>>>computers, studying a chess tree, trying to find the best possible continuation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Actually, not. That is the vicious influence from Kotov's teaching that
>>>>>>made everybody think that they should think like a tree.
>>>>>>There are recently two books that finally made in writing what everybody
>>>>>>suspected. "Improve your Chess Now" by J. Tisdall and "Secrets of Practical
>>>>>>Chess". Not even amateurs are taught NOT to think like a tree nowadays, and the
>>>>>>best book about it is "How to reasess your Chess" by J. Silman.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>First quote from Tisdall's book, first Chapter ("The Fabled Tree of Analysis"):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"I do not think like a tree - do you think like a tree?" GM Anatoly Lein.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There are certain situations where a strong player think like a tree, but
>>>>>>their thinking should certainly not be characterized by that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Taking as an example Kasparov, he is renowned for his powerful calculations
>>>>>capabilities of the variations (...tree), both in analysis and both in OTB.
>>>>
>>>>Being able to come up with variations does not a tree searcher make.
>>>>
>>>>A SEE can come up with a variation and it's not searching anything.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I don't think so.
>>>
>>>My SEE for example is a recursive function. It is a tree searching algorithm,
>>>but a special one
>>
>>Maybe you should call it a DEE then.
>>-Tom
>
>
>
>Why DEE???

Dynamic Exchange Evaluator. If you are visiting different positions in your SEE,
then I don't see that it's so Static anymore...
-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.