Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 01:18:06 12/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
>The pv is dependent on the depth qsearch and starting from the pv is not >something very interesting. >The history table is also dependent on the qsearch and if the qsearch is limited >there is a bigger chance that the history table is going to be wrong. > Well, I don't do those in qsearch, so that's the reason. If you do, then limiting will of course have an effect. >>>0 2868842 >>>1 3611982 >>>2 997968 >>>3 1564826 >>>4 1196247 >>>5 1214999 >>>6 1184129 >>>7 1153555 >>>8 1180282 >>>9 1153618 >>>=10 1153584 >> >>I don't quite understand the numbers (they include _all_ the nodes, right?) >>above. 0 means actually a 7 ply search with no qsearch at all? 1 means 7 plies >>of full width and 1 ply qsearch? How can 2 ply limit have only 997968 nodes? >>Shouldn't the number increase when increasing the limit? I'm missing now >>something important... > >It seems to be a question of luck >The program sometimes change it's mind more often or less often but my >impression is that limiting the qsearch does not reduce the number of nodes in >general. I think something might be broken. The jumps are way too big. Do you get crazy PVs? I don't understand why limiting would increase the size. And on the other hand: if limiting doesn't even decrease the size why on earth do you limit? But I think something odd is happening or you don't count nodes right as the above numbers are very strange? Where exactly do you increase node counters? Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.