Author: James T. Walker
Date: 06:54:00 12/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2001 at 21:14:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 29, 2001 at 20:54:14, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Thanks for the info. I think this also proves that Deep Blue's evaluation was >>not as simple/crude as some people here try to portray it. >>Jim > >It does not mean that the evaluation was good. > >It seems that Deep thought wasted time in calculating tables that may be good to >evaluate the root position but not good to evaluate the leaves of the tree. > >Uri Hello Uri, Your point is well taken but do any programs recalculate the value of pieces at the leafs? It seems to me that doing this before each move may be better than not doing it at all. It does not necessarily mean the eval was good or bad but it was doing something that others were not. I believe it also shows it was not as simple/crude as some people here like to say. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.