Author: Michel Langeveld
Date: 12:36:51 12/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
My first numbers were wrong. Vincent helped me a bit to get the right numbers. Thanks Vincent!! DATA ==== total nodes : 12230155 eval nodes : 8266510 qsearch 1st calls : 5832765 other qsearch nodes : 2441207 total qsearch nodes : 8273972 NULLMOVE DATA ============= nullmove starts : 79077 nodes after nullmove : 9420739 qsearch 1st calls after nullmove : 2759399 other qsearchnodes after nullmove : 1441173 total qsearchnodes after nullmove : 4200572 So 19.96% of the total nodes are generated by QSearch. So 50.78% of all my qsearch nodes are generate after a nullmove. On December 30, 2001 at 14:01:20, Michel Langeveld wrote: >>Try to get similar counting scheme so figures are comparable. Here is the >>position: >>[d] rnbqkbnr/ppp2ppp/8/3pp3/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 >> >>And please tell if you use SEE or not. I'll post my results soon also. >> >>Severi > >PV : exd5 Qxd5 dxe5 Qxd1 >Evaluation : 18 >Time needed : 223.39 sec >Total nodes : 12230155 >qsearch nodes : 8273973 >eval nodes : 8266511 >nullmove nodes : 79078 (starts of nullmove) > >67.5% of my nodes are QSearch nodes. >I don't limit QSearch at the moment >I search do the following in QSearch (promotions and en passant) > >I don't use SEE at the moment. > >Can someone say if this good? > >regards, > >Michel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.