Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 13:57:26 12/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2001 at 16:52:27, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On December 30, 2001 at 13:01:40, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 30, 2001 at 11:57:21, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On December 30, 2001 at 11:34:59, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>It will make your Chess Tiger 70 elo points stronger. >>>> >>>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>> >>>Notice that my Handspring Visor is NOT overclocked this little Master CT 14.7 is >>>a Killer! >>> >>> >>> >>>[Event "Testing CT 14.7"] >>>[Site "Game in 30 Minutes"] >>>[Date "2001.10.29 18:09"] >>>[Round "?"] >>>[White "Chess Tiger 14.7 Handspring 33 MHz"] >>>[Black "Novav Turquoise USCF 2294"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>> >>>1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 e6 3. Bc4 d5 4. exd5 exd5 5. Bb5 a6 6. Bxc6+ bxc6 >>>7. Qe2+ Qe7 8. Qxe7+ Bxe7 9. O-O Bb4 10. c3 Bd6 11. Re1+ Ne7 12. Nd4 c5 >>>13. Nc6 Be6 14. Nxe7 Kxe7 15. d4 c6 16. Be3 cxd4 17. Bxd4 Rab8 18. Re2 Rhg8 >>>19. b4 a5 20. a3 Rb7 21. Nd2 Bf4 22. Nb3 axb4 23. axb4 Kd6 24. Bc5+ Kd7 >>>25. Bd4 Bd6 26. Bc5 Bg4 27. Re3 Bf5 28. Rae1 f6 29. Bxd6 Kxd6 30. Nc5 Ra7 >>>31. Nb3 Ra3 32. Nc5 Rb8 33. Re7 Bc8 34. Rxg7 Rxc3 35. Rxh7 Rxb4 36. Rh8 Bf5 >>>37. Na6 Re4 38. Ra1 Rc2 39. Rd8+ Ke7 40. Rg8 c5 41. Nc7 Kd6 42. Nb5+ Ke5 >>>43. Re8+ Kf4 44. g3+ Kg4 45. Rxe4+ Bxe4 46. Nd6 Bf3 47. Ra4+ c4 48. Ra1 1-0 >> >> >>Did tiger win the game on time? > >Yes, it did, and I counted the win too. >>Black is clearly better >> >>Note that both machines cannot see simple tactics and I mean tactics that most >>2000 players are going to see at game/30 > >Here is my answer to that reply. >On friday the 14 of Dec 2001, I took my little GIZMO (CT 14.7 Handspring ) >to the Local chess Club and I found a player rated USCF around 2150. I asked him >if he didn't mind playing one game against my little GIZMO and he asked is that >for real, WOW they have come a long way. To my surprise he told me that he >participated in a Human Vs Computer little tourney back in 1983 and he was >matched to play against BELLE which was rated close to an expert according to >him. Anyway he was able to achieved a draw against the legendary BELLE. Suddenly >I became more interested to match CT 14.7 against him and after 69 moves he told >me WOW computer have come a long way since BELLE. I never dreamed that a >Handheld chess computer could be as powerful a BELLE was back then. After a >couple of more moves he repeated the position and CT 14.7 repeated three times >and the game ended in a draw. The only thing that I forgot to do was to record >the game or even save it, since I turned my Handspring Off and my wife came to >pick me up to see a movie. I did noticed that he was NOT a tactical player, but >a good strategical player who maneuver the pieces wonderfully across the board. >Next time that I see him I'll ask him to play another game, and will save it and >post it the next day. > > >> >>40.Rg8 is losing the knight when 40...c5 is a mistake when Ra2 is winning the >>knight >> >>My program finds Ra2 after 7395 nodes at depth 4 and has no problem to see >>a winning score at depth 5. >> >>Interesting to say that the main line of my program at depth 4 when it does not >>see a winning score for black is Ra2 Rg7+ Kf8 Rf7+ Kxf7 Rxa2 >> >>I guess that mate extensions for the right cases >>may prevent this horizon effect >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.