Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:26:39 12/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2001 at 05:28:54, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 31, 2001 at 05:26:11, Michel Langeveld wrote: >>I want to check how efficient Nullmover is. > >By how often you fail high on your first choice. I disagree with this method. I think the right way is to find how much time you need to get a fixed depth. If you reduce the time without adding pruning rules then the change in move ordering is a good change. If you fail high for the wrong reason you can waste nodes. It is better to fail high when the reason is a checkmate and not to fail high because of winning a pawn. Uri
This page took 1.36 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.