Author: Michel Langeveld
Date: 03:43:33 12/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2001 at 05:28:54, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 31, 2001 at 05:26:11, Michel Langeveld wrote: >>I want to check how efficient Nullmover is. > >By how often you fail high on your first choice. time=35.04 cpu=97% mat=0 n=14164653 fh=91% nps=404k ext-> chk=587453 cap=73868 pp=5119 1rep=28823 mate=293 predicted=0 nodes=14164653 evals=4235981 endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 hashing-> trans/ref=28% pawn=98% used=21% SMP-> split=0 stop=0 data=0/64 cpu=33.99 elap=35.04 1) Crafty needs 2 million nodes more. 2) I build with optimized settings now and my program needs 56.51 seconds for this position (with all statistal data switched on). The time crafty needs is about 40% less than my time. 3) The number of nodes crafty needs is almost twice the number of nps I get. I have 216515,87 nps at the moment. 4) I have no killers yet. Michel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.