Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:07:58 12/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2001 at 06:43:33, Michel Langeveld wrote: >On December 31, 2001 at 05:28:54, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On December 31, 2001 at 05:26:11, Michel Langeveld wrote: >>>I want to check how efficient Nullmover is. >> >>By how often you fail high on your first choice. > >time=35.04 cpu=97% mat=0 n=14164653 fh=91% nps=404k >ext-> chk=587453 cap=73868 pp=5119 1rep=28823 mate=293 >predicted=0 nodes=14164653 evals=4235981 >endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 >hashing-> trans/ref=28% pawn=98% used=21% >SMP-> split=0 stop=0 data=0/64 cpu=33.99 elap=35.04 > >1) Crafty needs 2 million nodes more. > >2) I build with optimized settings now and my program needs 56.51 seconds for >this position (with all statistal data switched on). The time crafty needs is >about 40% less than my time. > >3) The number of nodes crafty needs is almost twice the number of nps I get. >I have 216515,87 nps at the moment. > >4) I have no killers yet. > >Michel There is a problem with comparing nodes with Crafty if you do not use the same extensions and the same R for null move as Crafty. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.