Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:46:12 12/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2001 at 09:36:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 31, 2001 at 08:38:42, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On December 31, 2001 at 08:36:02, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>If somebody wants to verify this, they can have a small round robin match using >>>the same hardware. I guess there are a lot of people here who are willing to >>>find out the true. The fourth programs that I recommend are: >>> >>> >>>1.ChessMaster 8000 = 2520 (Original, Non of the modified Personalities) >>>2.Gandalf = 2533 >>>3.Nimzo 8 = 2555 >>>4.Which do you select as the fourth weakest Commercial Chess Proram? >>> >>>PS: If you compare them on equal hardware the weakest programs according to the >>>SSDF on K6-2 450 MHz are in this order. >>> >>> >>>Jorge > >You forget that there are commercial programs that were not tested by the ssdf > >one of them is stobor >see http://home.earthlink.net/~tckjr/ > >I also do not see the point of finding the weakest commercial program because >people usually are interested in the strongest and not in the weakest. > >Uri I believe that even if you are interested only in programs that were tested by the ssdf you can see Genius5 in the list. Genius5 is not a free program and I believe that you can get it by paying for it. I also believe that stobor of tom kerrigen is not the weakest commercial program and I believe that sargoonV is weaker than it. I am not sure about today and maybe it is free but I remember that it was commercial one or two years ago. If you are interested in the weakest commercial program then the first problem is to find them because there are commercial programs that almost nobody knows about and it may be possible that the number of their buyers are 5 or 6(the number should be positive otherwise everybody can consider her(his) program as commercial). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.