Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:28:04 01/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2002 at 09:20:03, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 01, 2002 at 09:00:26, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>Everybody knows that Gambit Tiger Aggresive play too risky, and it is probably >>75 rating points lower than Chess Tiger 14.0. > >I do not know it >There are some evidence that Gambittiger aggresive is even better than chess >tiger14 > >See http://www.harald-faber.de/englisch/HaraldE.htm > >Gambittiger aggresive scores 65.5 points against the smae opponent that tiger14 >scored only 61.5 The same opponents(there were 100 games against 10 different opponents) > >The number of games is not enough to prove that tiger aggressive is better but I >do not understand how do you say that everybody knows things that are not known. > >Uri The results suggest that Gambittiger aggresive is 28 elo better than tiger14 the possible error in 100 game is bigger than 28 elo so we cannot be sure if tiger aggresive is better because the error in 100 game is bigger than 28 elo. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.