Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 08:06:39 01/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2002 at 09:28:04, Uri Blass wrote:
>On January 01, 2002 at 09:20:03, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On January 01, 2002 at 09:00:26, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>Everybody knows that Gambit Tiger Aggresive play too risky, and it is probably
>>>75 rating points lower than Chess Tiger 14.0.
>>
>>I do not know it
>>There are some evidence that Gambittiger aggresive is even better than chess
>>tiger14
>>
>>See http://www.harald-faber.de/englisch/HaraldE.htm
>>
>>Gambittiger aggresive scores 65.5 points against the smae opponent that tiger14
>>scored only 61.5
>
>The same opponents(there were 100 games against 10 different opponents)
>
>>
>>The number of games is not enough to prove that tiger aggressive is better but I
>>do not understand how do you say that everybody knows things that are not known.
>>
>>Uri
>
>The results suggest that Gambittiger aggresive is 28 elo better than tiger14
>
>the possible error in 100 game is bigger than 28 elo so we cannot be sure if
>tiger aggresive is better because the error in 100 game is bigger than 28 elo.
>
>Uri
I have played several matches on the internet and Chess Tiger 14.0 is
having a bigger margin of wins against humans than Gambit Tiger Aggresive. Plus
my own testing still indicate that Chess Tiger 14.0 is better than Gambit Tiger
aggresive.
Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.