Author: Christian Koch
Date: 08:38:11 01/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
GREAT! Your games and THE REST OF THE WORLD!! On January 01, 2002 at 11:06:39, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On January 01, 2002 at 09:28:04, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 01, 2002 at 09:20:03, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 01, 2002 at 09:00:26, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>Everybody knows that Gambit Tiger Aggresive play too risky, and it is probably >>>>75 rating points lower than Chess Tiger 14.0. >>> >>>I do not know it >>>There are some evidence that Gambittiger aggresive is even better than chess >>>tiger14 >>> >>>See http://www.harald-faber.de/englisch/HaraldE.htm >>> >>>Gambittiger aggresive scores 65.5 points against the smae opponent that tiger14 >>>scored only 61.5 >> >>The same opponents(there were 100 games against 10 different opponents) >> >>> >>>The number of games is not enough to prove that tiger aggressive is better but I >>>do not understand how do you say that everybody knows things that are not known. >>> >>>Uri >> >>The results suggest that Gambittiger aggresive is 28 elo better than tiger14 >> >>the possible error in 100 game is bigger than 28 elo so we cannot be sure if >>tiger aggresive is better because the error in 100 game is bigger than 28 elo. >> >>Uri > > > I have played several matches on the internet and Chess Tiger 14.0 is >having a bigger margin of wins against humans than Gambit Tiger Aggresive. Plus >my own testing still indicate that Chess Tiger 14.0 is better than Gambit Tiger >aggresive. > >Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.