Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:48:46 01/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2002 at 16:02:12, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On January 01, 2002 at 14:46:20, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 01, 2002 at 14:30:46, David Rasmussen wrote: >> >>>On January 01, 2002 at 13:25:44, Heiner Marxen wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Chest agrees with your numbers: >>>> >>>>FEN: 1b5k/7P/p1p2np1/2P2p2/PP3P2/4RQ1R/q2r3P/6K1 w - - >>>>Counting width of legal tree, 5 plies deep... >>>>Time (user) = 9.84 sec >>>>dep #nodes quot sum nodes >>>> 0 1 [ 0.000] 1 >>>> 1 31 [ 31.000] 32 >>>> 2 1213 [ 39.129] 1245 >>>> 3 35927 [ 29.618] 37172 >>>> 4 1353197 [ 37.665] 1390369 >>>> 5 40590029 [ 29.996] 41980398 >>>> >>>>(Done on a K7/600) >>>> >>>>Cheers, >>>>Heiner >>> >>>Chezzz agrees too. >>> >>>/David >> >>my program says perft 6=1483136098 after 207.549 seconds on p800 >> >>Uri > >Chest agrees again: > > 6 1483136098 [ 36.539] 1525116496 >Time (user) = 314.31 sec (5.2 min) > >Your speed is not bad, at least significantly faster than Chest. And since >we both generate strictly legal moves, our times are comparable. >Congratulations! I don't understand your output. Here is Beowulf output: [1]W > perft 6 Progress : .................... Total: 119060324 Moves 48.25 Seconds Here is Yace output: white ( 1): perft 6 1: 20 2: 400 3: 8902 4: 197281 5: 4865609 6: 119060324 Used 36.508 s And Pepito: Pepito> perft 6 Time spent: 40.16 Paths searched: 119060324 Pepito> What exactly are you measuring?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.