Author: pavel
Date: 21:09:22 01/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2002 at 23:31:49, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 01, 2002 at 17:27:32, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>Opinion: >>Banning is not an act that should be done by vote of the CCC membership. >> >>Will we remove everyone who is unpopular? Unpopular opinions are necessary, as >>they test out our ideas. I really like some of the posters who are less popular >>than the others. >> >>Banning should be done by the moderators based upon their reasoned opinions. >> >>I notice that he has not posted here for a few days and that his old posts seem >>to be gone. >> >>I suspect that the moderators may have already taken appropriate action (whether >>banning, or kicking him out for a week or whatever). >> >>Aside from this board, if he is doing illegal things, then he should be arrested >>and put in jail. But I don't think the board should act on his outside >>activities. Of course, that is a judgement call, and if the moderators feel >>differently, they should be free to do as they see best. >> >>Since the issue has now died down (one way or another -- maybe Gogi just knocked >>it off...) then I don't see a lot of value in trying to have a trial by opinion >>poll. >> >>Sometimes, posters just get off on the wrong foot. 'ERIC' springs to mind. He >>started off with a flurry of stuff that was pretty odd, but he soon calmed down. >> >>As for passionate people -- I say the more the merrier. No sense turning this >>place into a library. Of course, whatever anyone does should be within the >>confines of the charter. >> >>And there is always CTF (which seems to be pretty well a free for all right >>now). > > > >That's a lot of patience, philosophy and intelligence for somebody who most >certainly does not deserve it. > >This place is quite strange. You can kick anybody in the ass and have a good >laugh then watching people wondering "was it such a bad action?", "isn't it >useful in some way?", "what is justice eventually?", "Should we take action?", >"Do we have the right to take action?" and so on (watch the discussion >degenerate into "is there a god?", "is there life on Mars?", "isn't Goran the >inventor of the Rubik's cube?"...). > >We are weak. > > > > Christophe I agree. I don't understand why a making a decision against this guy is so hard. It's obvious that this guy isn't here for good intention, or he is just plainly insane. pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.