Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 22:45:53 01/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2002 at 20:23:49, Michael Cummings wrote: >On January 01, 2002 at 13:57:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On January 01, 2002 at 04:06:10, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On December 31, 2001 at 15:14:56, Kevin Strickland wrote: >>> >>>>This afternoon I got an email from Gogi Cviak (cvrcko1@hotmail.com) with a sub7 >>>>virus attached stating that it was the first in his "wave" of attacks against >>>>the people of this forum for making fun of him and providing details of his >>>>emails to some of us. >>>> >>>>I have only one thing to say to you Gogi. I hope you enjoy no internet service >>>>or atleast having to switch them. I have informed Hotmail of your actions with >>>>their service, and as part of their ToS they will inform your isp. >>>> >>>>Happy New Year. >>>> >>>>PS - Take off the damn CAPS. >>> >>>This guy deserve to be banned from this forum and I hope that Steve or >>>Moderators already took steps... >>> >>>Happy New Year, >>>Otello. >> >>To make it clear, I am an ex-moderator, but I put "moderation" in the title >>because that's what we are talking about. >> >>Whether or not this guy *should* be gotten rid of is an interesting and very >>serious question. >> >>If he had said rude things to all of us *here*, of the same magnitude as sending >>someone a virus in the mail, he'd probably be gone. >> >>If he had never posted here, and instead all of this had sprung from discussions >>elsewhere, like for instance r.g.c.c., there is no argument to ban him here. >> >>That he has seemingly taken "outside" revenge based upon arguments taking place >>here is an interesting middle ground, and any action taken in this case should >>come after a *lot* of consideration by the moderators. >> >>That he sent me or Christophe or Bob rude email has no bearing on CCC, I think. >>He probably thought to contact me because I answered one of his posts here, but >>beyond that it was just an email interaction that went a little sour, and the >>case is not at all related to anything that happened on the board. The same is >>probably true of Bob and Christophe. >> >>These cases are like cases where one member sues another over something that >>happened outside. The board shouldn't take sides in these cases. That someone >>won the court case doesn't mean that the other guy loses his account. >> >>I'm more concerned about this case where someone gets into an argument here, and >>as a direct consequence intentionally sends someone a virus. That is probably a >>real crime of some sort, or at least it is *very* nasty and malicious, and >>furthermore it's obviously very closely *related* to posts made here. >> >>I don't want to have to deal with people who do that. If someone gets a >>reputation for sending viruses or threats or harassing email if you argue with >>them, I think that's grounds for getting rid of the account. >> >>bruce > >He is sending emails containing virus's to members of this forum saying it is >the first wave of attacks against this forum. The virus is one it which when >infecting the persons computer will be able to give him access. > >Sending emails like this is a crime, especially when you state you are doing >this for revenge, etc. > >I sent a moderator email to steve, with him saying to send the email details, >but I hope other people kept theirs, because anything with a virus I totally >wipe strait away. So my proof is wiped. Did he hit you, too? I didn't get hit, but I've made arrangements that may make it harder for him to hit me, so perhaps he tried and I avoided getting hit. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.