Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 22:47:26 01/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
Gambit Tiger 2.0 aggressive on AMD 1400 with 512 Mb RAM. 00:00:00.0 1.66 8 150792 b4xa5 00:00:00.1 1.56 8 243849 Rd1-d8 Re7-e5 Rb8-a8+ Ka7-b7 b4xa5 b6xa5 Rd8-b8+ Kb7-c7 Rb8-e8 f7-f6 Bg3xe5+ f6xe5 Ra8xa5 00:00:00.1 1.54 9 312160 Rd1-d8 Re7-e5 Rb8-a8+ Ka7-b7 Rd8-b8+ Kb7-c7 Rb8-e8 f7-f6 Bg3xe5+ f6xe5 Ra8-a7+ Kc7-d6 b4xa5 b6xa5 Ra7xa5 00:00:02.4 1.54 10 1022493 Rd1-d8 Re7-e5 Rb8-a8+ Ka7-b7 Rd8-b8+ Kb7-c7 Rb8-e8 f7-f6 Ra8-a7+ Kc7-d6 b4xa5 b6xa5 Bg3xe5+ f6xe5 Ra7xa5 00:00:03.4 2.16 10 1150514 b4xa5 b6xa5 b5-b6+ Ka7-a6 Rd1-b1 a5-a4 b6-b7 Qe3-a7 Rb8-a8 Re7xb7 Ra8xa7+ Rb7xa7 Rb1-b8 00:00:04.6 2.70 11 1704976 b4xa5 b6xa5 b5-b6+ Qe3xb6 Rb8xb6 Ka7xb6 Rd1-d6+ Kb6-c5 Rd6-h6 Re7-e2 Rh6xh7 f7-f5 Rh7-c7+ Kc5-b5 Kh2-h3 00:00:06.9 2.70 12 2542588 b4xa5 b6xa5 b5-b6+ Qe3xb6 Rb8xb6 Ka7xb6 Rd1-d6+ Kb6-c5 Rd6-h6 Kc5-c4 Rh6xh7 a5-a4 Bg3-d6 Re7-d7 Bd6-e5 00:00:12.7 2.92 13 4704814 b4xa5 b6xa5 b5-b6+ Qe3xb6 Rb8xb6 Ka7xb6 Bg3-f2+ Kb6-a6 Rd1-d6+ Ka6-b5 Rd6-d5+ Kb5-a6 Rd5xg5 a5-a4 Bf2-c5 Re7-e2 Rg5-h5 Re2-c2 00:00:24.5 2.92 14 9385731 b4xa5 b6xa5 b5-b6+ Qe3xb6 Rb8xb6 Ka7xb6 Bg3-f2+ Kb6-a6 Rd1-d6+ Ka6-b5 Rd6-d5+ Kb5-a6 Rd5xg5 a5-a4 Bf2-c5 Re7-e2 Rg5-h5 Re2-c2 00:04:17.0 3.82 14 97933144 Rd1-d8 It seems that finally the score is nearly a point higher after over ten fold the number of moves searched even though Rd1-d8 was considered early on. Tim On January 01, 2002 at 18:48:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 01, 2002 at 17:57:00, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>After changing a few things in the way my engine communicates >>with WinBoard, I played a test game to see if I had not broken >>Fritz's WinBoard adapter support. >> >>To my surprise, the following happened: >> >>[Event "Test game"] >>[Site "GCP"] >>[Date "2002.01.01"] >>[Round "1"] >>[White "Sjeng 12.7"] >>[Black "Fritz 7"] >>[Result "1-0"] >>[ECO "C07"] >>[PlyCount "73"] >> >>1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 c5 4. Ngf3 Nc6 5. Bb5 dxe4 6. Nxe4 Bd7 >>7. d5 exd5 8. Qxd5 Qa5+ 9. Nc3 Nf6 10. Qg5 Ne4 11. Qe3 O-O-O >>12. Qxe4 Re8 13. Qxe8+ Bxe8 14. O-O Bd6 15. Rd1 Nd4 16. Nxd4 cxd4 >>17. Rxd4 Bxh2+ 18. Kxh2 Bxb5 19. Bf4 Bc6 20. Rad1 Qf5 21. Kg1 Re8 >>22. f3 g5 23. Bg3 Qxc2 24. R4d2 Qf5 25. b4 b6 26. Rd6 Kb7 >>27. a4 Re3 28. Nb5 Bxb5 29. axb5 Re7 30. R6d5 Qf6 31. Rd6 Qc3 >>32. Rd8 Qe3+ 33. Kh2 a5 34. Rb8+ Ka7 35. Rdd8 Qf4 36. Bxf4 gxf4 >>37. Ra8+ 1-0 >> >>Great way to start the new year, don't you think :) > >This does not look like any sort of accident. A slow and steady buildup of >strength until the finishing blow. By here, for sure Sjeng has already won: >[D]3R4/pk2rp1p/1p6/1P4p1/1P6/2q2PB1/6P1/3R2K1 b - - > >But the amazing move is this one: >[D]1R6/k3rp1p/1p6/pP4p1/1P6/4qPB1/6PK/3R4 w - - bm Rdd8; am bxa5; c0 "WOW!"; > >Absolutely incredible that Sjeng found Rdd8, since the vastly inferior bxa5 >looks so good to programs. Now, bxa5 is a good enough move to probably win >eventually. But Rdd8 is a positive death blow! > >Which programs (after a good, long, think) choose Rdd8 over bxa5? > >You have really done something wonderful here.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.