Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 23:18:52 01/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2002 at 01:45:53, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On January 01, 2002 at 20:23:49, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On January 01, 2002 at 13:57:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On January 01, 2002 at 04:06:10, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>>On December 31, 2001 at 15:14:56, Kevin Strickland wrote: >>>> >>>>>This afternoon I got an email from Gogi Cviak (cvrcko1@hotmail.com) with a sub7 >>>>>virus attached stating that it was the first in his "wave" of attacks against >>>>>the people of this forum for making fun of him and providing details of his >>>>>emails to some of us. >>>>> >>>>>I have only one thing to say to you Gogi. I hope you enjoy no internet service >>>>>or atleast having to switch them. I have informed Hotmail of your actions with >>>>>their service, and as part of their ToS they will inform your isp. >>>>> >>>>>Happy New Year. >>>>> >>>>>PS - Take off the damn CAPS. >>>> >>>>This guy deserve to be banned from this forum and I hope that Steve or >>>>Moderators already took steps... >>>> >>>>Happy New Year, >>>>Otello. >>> >>>To make it clear, I am an ex-moderator, but I put "moderation" in the title >>>because that's what we are talking about. >>> >>>Whether or not this guy *should* be gotten rid of is an interesting and very >>>serious question. >>> >>>If he had said rude things to all of us *here*, of the same magnitude as sending >>>someone a virus in the mail, he'd probably be gone. >>> >>>If he had never posted here, and instead all of this had sprung from discussions >>>elsewhere, like for instance r.g.c.c., there is no argument to ban him here. >>> >>>That he has seemingly taken "outside" revenge based upon arguments taking place >>>here is an interesting middle ground, and any action taken in this case should >>>come after a *lot* of consideration by the moderators. >>> >>>That he sent me or Christophe or Bob rude email has no bearing on CCC, I think. >>>He probably thought to contact me because I answered one of his posts here, but >>>beyond that it was just an email interaction that went a little sour, and the >>>case is not at all related to anything that happened on the board. The same is >>>probably true of Bob and Christophe. >>> >>>These cases are like cases where one member sues another over something that >>>happened outside. The board shouldn't take sides in these cases. That someone >>>won the court case doesn't mean that the other guy loses his account. >>> >>>I'm more concerned about this case where someone gets into an argument here, and >>>as a direct consequence intentionally sends someone a virus. That is probably a >>>real crime of some sort, or at least it is *very* nasty and malicious, and >>>furthermore it's obviously very closely *related* to posts made here. >>> >>>I don't want to have to deal with people who do that. If someone gets a >>>reputation for sending viruses or threats or harassing email if you argue with >>>them, I think that's grounds for getting rid of the account. >>> >>>bruce >> >>He is sending emails containing virus's to members of this forum saying it is >>the first wave of attacks against this forum. The virus is one it which when >>infecting the persons computer will be able to give him access. >> >>Sending emails like this is a crime, especially when you state you are doing >>this for revenge, etc. >> >>I sent a moderator email to steve, with him saying to send the email details, >>but I hope other people kept theirs, because anything with a virus I totally >>wipe strait away. So my proof is wiped. > >Did he hit you, too? > >I didn't get hit, but I've made arrangements that may make it harder for him to >hit me, so perhaps he tried and I avoided getting hit. > >bruce I got wacked by him, mainly because in the CTF, I trashed him right away, cause I knew he was a trouble maker.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.