Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 09:02:27 01/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2002 at 10:05:37, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On January 02, 2002 at 15:34:55, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>I've tried running Crafty at my universitys multiprocessor machines, with poor >>results. Using 4 processors was kind of ok, but not great (~750 knps), but using >>many more processors (16, 24, etc.) just made it slower. How crummy is that. >> >>/David > >Hi your email adress in your profile here doesn't work. > Yes it does. It's pinkfloydhomer@yahoo.com and it works fine. A lot of spam get's through to me at least :) >What i emailed to you is i would love to take a shot at it with DIEP. > I am beginning to have doubts whether I want to share my account. I wouldn't want to get kicked out from my university because of that. And as Hyatt haven't showed much interest either, I think I will take my time and ask around my university if it would be OK to share my account this way. >DIEP's parallellism is improved form of cray blitz. Crafty just splits >when it happens to be able to split. At n processors that's of course >disaster. As bob can point out to you he didn't make crafty for so >many processors, he had made cray blitz for that though. > OK. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.